What ethical question does the film GATTACA raise about 'playing God'?

What ethical question does the film GATTACA raise about 'playing God'?

• A. Whether scientists should create life forms from scratch
• B. If humans should have the right to alter DNA
• C. Whether natural birth should be banned
• D. If only certain individuals should have access to genetic enhancements

Answer: (B)

The film GATTACA explores the ethical implications of genetic manipulation and the extent to which humans should intervene in natural processes, particularly concerning DNA alteration. The narrative delves deeply into the consequences that arise when individuals can modify their genetic makeup to enhance specific traits, leading to a genetically engineered society where worth is often assigned based on predetermined genetic profiles. This central theme reflects the ethical dilemma surrounding the right to modify DNA. It raises questions about the morality of such actions, the potential for inequality, and the societal implications of 'playing God'—that is, taking on the role of a creator by manipulating the fundamental building blocks of life. The film suggests that while the ability to alter DNA may bring forth advancements and enhancements, it also engenders risks, such as creating a class divide or undermining the value of individuals born without genetic modifications. The other choices, though related to broader themes in the film, do not focus directly on the ethical question of altering DNA. The creation of life forms from scratch is a different area of inquiry, while banning natural birth addresses reproductive rights rather than genetic modification ethics. Likewise, limiting access to genetic enhancements relates more to the implications of inequality in a genetically modified society rather than the fundamental question of whether humans should have the right

The film GATTACA explores the ethical implications of genetic manipulation and the extent to which humans should intervene in natural processes, particularly concerning DNA alteration. The narrative delves deeply into the consequences that arise when individuals can modify their genetic makeup to enhance specific traits, leading to a genetically engineered society where worth is often assigned based on predetermined genetic profiles.

This central theme reflects the ethical dilemma surrounding the right to modify DNA. It raises questions about the morality of such actions, the potential for inequality, and the societal implications of 'playing God'—that is, taking on the role of a creator by manipulating the fundamental building blocks of life. The film suggests that while the ability to alter DNA may bring forth advancements and enhancements, it also engenders risks, such as creating a class divide or undermining the value of individuals born without genetic modifications.

The other choices, though related to broader themes in the film, do not focus directly on the ethical question of altering DNA. The creation of life forms from scratch is a different area of inquiry, while banning natural birth addresses reproductive rights rather than genetic modification ethics. Likewise, limiting access to genetic enhancements relates more to the implications of inequality in a genetically modified society rather than the fundamental question of whether humans should have the right